Home > 25-50 HP Tractors > Belarus > 250AS << Back to List of Products





Belarus 250AS

Discontinued Model


Description

There is no description for this item in our database. You may add one here.


Photos
Displaying 1-8 of 8 photos
Reviews


Belarus 250AS Reviews



Overall Rating:
rating
Build Quality
rating
4.3
Features
rating
4.0
Performance
rating
4.3
Value
rating
4.5
Reliability
rating
4.5
(4.3 stars, 13 reviews)
View All Belarus 250AS Reviews


Specifications

Length 120 in. (304 cm)
(325 cm) (Three-Point)

Weight (Operating) 6

Weight (Shipping) 4

Weight 4300 to 6620 lbs

Wheelbase 69 in. (175 cm)

View all Belarus 250AS specifications


Reviews Posted
Sort by
Displaying 1 - 10 of 13 items
Belarus 250AS
rating
4.2
Posted 11/15/2013
by j crawford
Model year: 1986 Date Purchased: 2000-12-01 Number of Hours: 1290

"Excellent tough tractor."

REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pros: Big, heavy, tough, strong, and easy to work on. Cons: Ought to have been 4WD. Type of User: Homeowner 10-50 Acres Location: USA GA I also considered buying:
REVIEWER'S PHOTOS

Belarus
rating
3.7
Posted 11/14/2013
by rod booker
Model year: 1992 Date Purchased: 1994-11-14 Number of Hours:

"Best tractor ever made (also the ugliest but who cares)."

REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pros: Fuel friendly. Cons: No local parts. Type of User: Homeowner 10-50 Acres Location: USA LA I also considered buying: International Harvester 404, John Deere 400, Case-IH 444
REVIEWER'S PHOTOS

General
rating
4.2
Posted 11/14/2013
by jeffrey
Model year: 0 Date Purchased: 2010-06-12 Number of Hours:

"Bought cheap---$1,300. Starts nicely. Gear range is useable, traction not good when muddy. Engage diff lock helps but then steering suffers. Brush hogs okay. Not the best firewood puller. Have an old post hole auger I'm trying to retrofit to it. Very simple tractor."

REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pros: Simple to check over. Fit a 1 wire Chevy alternator easily. Short and stout. Great fuel economy. Cons: Bad brakes, no power steering, not much traction, PTO doesn't work when clutch pushed in. Type of User: Homeowner 50-100 Acres Location: USA NY I also considered buying:
REVIEWER'S PHOTOS

I Like It
rating
4.2
Posted 11/14/2013
by jim
Model year: 1998 Date Purchased: 2010-02-25 Number of Hours: 658

"Only had it a bit but it sure is a nice tractor."

REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pros: Cheap. Cons: Not many dealers. Type of User: Homeowner 50-100 Acres Location: USA PA I also considered buying: Allis Chalmers B, Allis Chalmers WD45, Caterpillar MT755
REVIEWER'S PHOTOS

Belarus
rating
3.8
Posted 08/07/2013
by robtj
Model year: 1995 Date Purchased: 1998-08-07 Number of Hours: 270

"How do you adjust brakes r add fl. They don't work."

REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pros: Have beat this down clearing land for horse have not broken it. Cons: Small thing like brake don't work. Type of User: Homeowner 1-10 Acres Location: USA AL I also considered buying:
REVIEWER'S PHOTOS

Belarus AS250 Review
rating
3.8
Posted 05/29/2012
by drs1023
Model year: 1989 Date Purchased: 1989-01-01 Number of Hours: 300

"I bought this tractor new in 1989, and it only has 300+ hours on it. It looks rough due to never being stored inside, so there's massive surface rust everywhere. Many of the hours is sitting at 3/4 throttle with a 3-point hitch wood splitter hooked to the hydraulics. The tractor was not built for comfort, speed or looks. It was built to pull equipment, and it has done everything a 31 hp diesel is expected to do. I bush hog, plow, disc, run a post hole auger, scrape, rotary tiller, etc., and it has never failed any of the tasks. The fuel pump went out a few years ago, and rather than spend the bucks on a new one, I installed a $30 electric one which feeds the injector box just fine. The alternator finally completely died a few months ago, and I replaced it with a Delco 1-wire. A little bracket modification was all that was necessary. The had the original starter rebuilt some years back, and it just failed again. I bought a new gear drive one to replace the factory direct drive one. All the reviews say I'll like that starter much better. It's a bear to drive due to no power steering and the added weight on the front tires. Should have never been made without power steering, but I did have a $700 choice to buy this option new. These tractors are work horses, but seem to hold little resale value. I've heard from dealers who sell other brands that the transmission is weak, but I haven't seen it. I've destroyed a bush hog drive shaft, twisted a pinion shaft off a auger, and disintegrated a ratche slip clutch on the PTO, but no transmission issues. "

REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pros: Strong, locking differential, good fuel economy. Cons: Poor wiring, expensive parts, have to have front suitcase weights to install heavy equipment. Original third arn bracket was weks. I had to remake it within the first two years due to it breaking in two pieces. Type of User: Homeowner 10-50 Acres Location: USA GA I also considered buying: Massey Ferguson TO-35, Branson 3510
REVIEWER'S PHOTOS

My Belarus 250
rating
3.5
Posted 03/01/2012
by Marshall Davenport
Model year: 0 Date Purchased: 2012-03-01 Number of Hours: 1350

"I bought from a previous owner who didn't like because he couldn't understand the shifting pattern. This tractor has manual steering but I would have preferred power. The reason I bought it was because of the loader and the tractor was in great shape for the money."

REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pros: Good size tractor and the loader. Cons: Standard steering. Type of User: Homeowner 10-50 Acres Location: CND OT I also considered buying:
REVIEWER'S PHOTOS

Belarus 250AS
rating
2.3
Posted 01/05/2012
by Steve Thompson
Model year: 1997 Date Purchased: 1999-10-01 Number of Hours: 850

"This has to be the worst tractor ever built. Way too heavy, electrical and fuel problems, turns hard, no breaks, complicated, too many levers, hydraulic problems. Driving it is a real nightmare. On the plus side it has a lot of soul. When you do finally get it running and moving, it does a good job of moving forward, as long as there is not too much weight. I don't recommend anyone buy one unless they have plenty of time on their hands and like to meet a challenge head on. It is more like staying on a bucking bronco for 60 seconds. You end up with a sore ***, hurt bones, but your proud of your self for lasting as long as you did. "

REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pros: None. Cons: See above. Type of User: Homeowner 1-10 Acres Location: USA KY I also considered buying:
REVIEWER'S PHOTOS

250 As My First 3 pt Hitch
rating
3.7
Posted 01/05/2012
by jeff
Model year: 0 Date Purchased: 2010-04-05 Number of Hours: 0

"Solid tractor, good steel, easy fluids, ease of shifting, soft footprint, fuel lasts long time, nice to have now that the bugs are worked out. Only $1400, after some oil in tranny. Solved the locking up problem. She's working okay. Can't seem to adjust brakes enough to function without also dragging considerably. That's now all that bugs me."

REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pros: Oops, great on fuel solid for size, forward reverse lever, posi lock. Cons: Hard steering, tricky climb up, should check fluids often, needs good battery. Type of User: Homeowner 10-50 Acres Location: USA NY I also considered buying:
REVIEWER'S PHOTOS

The Best for Me
rating
5.0
Posted 01/05/2012
by ron
Model year: 1978 Date Purchased: 2005-04-02 Number of Hours: 210

"-3 point power up and down -start in canada cold weather -40 -easy on fuel -can lower and raise -lots of POT power -loader work good on it (can pick up a full size car)"

REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Pros: The best little tractor . Cons: There is none. Type of User: Homeowner 1-10 Acres Location: CND OT I also considered buying: New Holland 3010, Kubota B3000
REVIEWER'S PHOTOS

© 2020 TractorByNet.com. TractorByNet is a registered trademark of IMC Digital Universe, Inc. Other trademarks on this page are the property of their respective owners.